Europe took a further step towards restoring confidence in its banking system on Friday as it published the results of stress tests into the region’s leading financial institutions, showing that only seven of 91 banks failed to meet its capital requirements.
However, investors signalled their distrust of the assumptions underlying the tests and the surprisingly small number of banks to fail the tests.
Five of the seven were cajas, Spanish savings banks, sparking nervousness that the pan-European exercise that Madrid had championed might backfire.
The Bank of Spain on Friday indicated that it had sufficient contingent liquidity measures in place to reassure caja customers and counter any threat of a run on these banks.
The Committee of European Banking Supervisors, which oversaw the tests, identified a capital shortfall of €3.5bn at the seven banks that failed to reach the pass mark of a 6 per cent tier one capital ratio.
The test involved modelling macroeconomic and sovereign debt stresses over 2010 and 2011, applied to end-2009 capital levels.
Germany’s Hypo Real Estate and Greece’s ATEbank were the only non-Spanish institutions to fail.
Among the near-fails, which analysts say could come under pressure to raise capital soon, were Italy’s Monte dei Paschi, on 6.2 per cent, Allied Irish Banks, on 6.5 per cent, and Germany’s Postbank, on 6.6 per cent.
A handful of some of Europe’s most-stretched banks announced a combined €1.3bn of capital raisings on Friday, just hours before regulators divulged the results of the test, although two of them – National Bank of Greece and Slovenia’s NLB – both passed.
The third, CĂvica, a caja based in northern Spain that failed the test, secured €450m of convertible bond finance from JC Flowers, the US buy-out firm that has a record of investing in troubled banks.
That marked the first time a caja had sought outside capital, following a liberalisation of the law governing the public sector institutions.
Among the top-rated banks in the tests was Barclays, the UK bank whose baseline tier one ratio of 13 per cent at the end of last year, rises under the stress scenario to 13.7 per cent by end-2011.
The two-month long test exercise has been closely scrutinised by investors, with growing scepticism in the markets that the parameters of the stress scenarios were insufficiently tough.
Germany also upset the pan-European exercise at the last minute by saying its banks would be disclosing the full details of sovereign debt holdings – an adjunct to the stress tests that all banks had been expected to comply with – only on a voluntary basis.
At least six German banks – including Deutsche Bank, Postbank, HRE and DZ Bank – did not publish sovereign holdings on Friday night.
“Arguably the failure here is not the banks concerned but the test itself,” said Richard Cranfield, chairman of the global corporate group at Allen & Overy, the law firm.
“There is little evidence that the tests have been applied consistently and there is a distinct lack of credibility, making this a wasted opportunity.
“One assumes those banks that have failed will be rescued or recapitalised. However, the banks that have scraped through may have more of a challenge on their hands and they may be the ones the market focuses on,” he said.
But European regulators hailed the results of the tests – which they said were three times as tough as last year’s US ones – as proof of the strength of the industry.
“The US did its tests before all its banks had recapitalised,” said Christian Noyer, governor of the Banque de France.
“European banks have now been through recapitalisations, restructurings, cleaning out of their portfolios. We’re arriving after the battle. A few years ago it would have been different,” he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment